In the End…It Doesn’t Have to Be All That Complicated

30 11 2008

Assuming you were blessed from birth with perfect design sense, and have spent years honing your cartooning craft, it really doesn’t have to be as complicated as all the above examples. A simple, perfectly constructed character will suffice. Thirty or so exquisitely placed lines. Watch Chester Brown work:

Drawn and Quarterly  © Chester Brownart: Chester Brown book: Louis Riel publisher: Drawn and Quarterly © Chester Brown

Drawn and Quarterly  © Chester Brownart: Chester Brown book: Louis Riel publisher: Drawn and Quarterly © Chester Brown

Is that God complaining about Mounties? So awesome!

Now, I was less than sold on Brown’s other work, particularly The Playboy. (What? People – adolescents at that! – look at pornographic materials, in secret, and then feel sort of guilty about it? Explain. ) But here Brown’s cartooning mastery cannot be ignored. These character designs combine The Yellow Submarine with the monumentality of Diego Rivera’s mural figures. The latter is perhaps not as left field as it seems: Louis Riel was a real-life revolutionary, so the larger-than-life quality of Rivera’s Communist Manifestos is fitting. Put this comic at the top of your read pile and you’ll find yourself wondering why all your superheroes seem so wussy and frail. Viva la Revolution! Rethink what you know!





Perfectly Controlled Cartooning

30 11 2008

OK, one last “Roll Call”-type image. Then I promise I’m done.

Fuuten  ©Shinji Nagashimaart: Shinji Nagashima book: Fuuten © Shinji Nagashima

These characters are from one of my favorite finds from my stay in Tokyo: a book from the Sixties or Seventies that is barely discussed called Fuuten, which roughly translates to “Bums” or “Homeless,” but I prefer “The Unwanted,” “Nobodies” or “Riffraff.” Shinji Nagashima’s pen and ink work is still stylish as all get-out today. Culturally and stylistically, I think it’s fair to say he is Japan’s R. Crumb, but I would not be surprised if he beat Crumb to the punch. His wonderful cartoons even amble around in a spread-legged gait that reminds an American audience of “Keep On Truckin’.” I am also not exaggerating in the slightest when I say the two volumes of Fuuten I am proud to have in my collection has had more effect on how I think of the potential of comics than anything Crumb has ever done. Did I just lose my indie comix cred card? Look at the spreads I post under Why Comics: Perfect Sequences and then get back to me with your ear-chewing. Nagashima can show the beauty of everyday existence on a comic book page. That resonates with everyone. I, personally, have never been drug-addled and sexually depraved and living in a loft in Haight-Ashbury. I love Crumb, but discussions of his work will be limited to his stylistic inking innovations. You could learn everything I have to teach by just getting a copy the complete Fuuten and drinking in every page.

Let’s focus on one aspect. Nagashima finds a way, within the constraints of his chosen “simplistic” style, to distinguish every character in his huge cast of characters. This is done with every trick we’ve discussed: accessories (hats, sunglasses), hairstyles, and brilliant cartooning: look at the shapes of all those heads! Your not at a loss for a moment in the tale for who is who. More than that, despite the few lines used, the characters do not read just as types. That would ruin a realistic yarn such as this, which is perhaps best compared to “On the Road,” minus the drugs, plus plot lines. These characters cannot become ciphers for the story to function. They must seem like real, individuated Japanese people, each with real problems and true loves. And they do.





Profile of a Profile

30 11 2008

Again, as long as you’re a mature enough artist to have some real cartooning chops, simplicity can be best in character design. It just takes one distinctive feature for recognition: Bart Simpson’s zigzag hair, Charlie Brown’s zigzag shirt (and hydrocephalic skull), or this:

Dark Horse Comics  © Frank Millerart: Frank Miller book: Sin City publisher: Dark Horse Comics © Frank Miller

That beautiful uninterrupted curve from hairline to nose defines Marv no matter how much ink Frank has left on his brush with intent to use. It is such an informed choice for a comic that thrives in the darkness of chiaroscuro. It allows for moments like this:

Dark Horse Comics  © Frank Millerart: Frank Miller book: Sin City publisher: Dark Horse Comics © Frank Miller

Even when he’s running through the woods at night, reader recognition is not an issue. Unless, of course, he were not shot from the side. I’m not even sure Frank knows what Marv looks like head-on.

Dark Horse Comics  © Frank Millerart: Frank Miller book: Sin City publisher: Dark Horse Comics © Frank Miller

By the way, I write these posts backwards so one can just start at the top in a category and scroll down through the entire lesson. My fiancee keeps telling me WordPress must have another way to sort these things, but I’ll be darned if I can find it. The point being, when this category is done, this will be the second time I have ended an argument with Frank Miller. It occurs to me that those could be words to live by. One could do worse than always ending an argument with Frank Miller…





The End of the World as We’ve Never Known It

30 11 2008

Regardless of one’s faith, the Apocalypse of St. John is an absolutely terrifying vision.   I remind us of this fact to pose a question: which is further afield of Biblical doctrine — beatific cherub guardian angels on our shoulders or metallic angels with guns?  The presence of the latter is but one reason to pick up Ted McKeever’s astounding Metropol.  Others are his tonally perfect disturbing art style (on which I will elaborate elsewhere on this site), his literally gritty depictions of city life (be it in the throes of hell on earth or just the everyday hellish), the sheer ugly horror of an unstoppable pandemic that leads to the quarantine of an entire metropolis, and scenes of such formal experimentalism and hallucinatory eeriness as this:

Epic Comics  © Ted McKeever art: Ted McKeever  book: Metropol  publisher: Epic Comics  © Ted McKeever

Epic Comics  © Ted McKeeverart: Ted McKeever  book: Metropol  publisher: Epic Comics  © Ted McKeever

Epic Comics  © Ted McKeeverart: Ted McKeever  book: Metropol  publisher: Epic Comics  © Ted McKeever

Epic Comics  © Ted McKeeverart: Ted McKeever  book: Metropol  publisher: Epic Comics  © Ted McKeever

Epic Comics  © Ted McKeeverart: Ted McKeever  book: Metropol  publisher: Epic Comics  © Ted McKeever

Epic Comics  © Ted McKeeverart: Ted McKeever  book: Metropol  publisher: Epic Comics  © Ted McKeever

What’s important to notice is that this whole sequence is “one take”: it’s one long pullback.  We begin across from those loading dock steps as a car pulls away, pan over to the man on crutches, pullback as a mysterious woman peers out her window, round the corner to the Hotel Ankh, back into an alleyway with working girls, fall back into a bar, hit the john, exit backward out the window reflected in the bathroom mirror into a tiny storeroom, back down a hallway, turn and back away from an employees only door, descend some steps, decline the invitation to an opened door, watch the offerer fade into nothingness, sidestep trucks peeling across the desert, linger on their dust, remove ourselves further to try to discern the breadth of some sort of smokestack filling our field of vision, and finally exit out the pupil of a deranged soul who is vainly trying to reassure a hanged man that he acted properly.

So few comic artists have attempted this film technique, but McKeever just takes the feeling of that continuous movement from this movie trope.  He’s too smart an illustrator to simply try to ape another field without realizing what is vital to his own.  The ending is pure illustration.  I’m not sure I can think of another comic book artist who has so boldly and effectively used negative space.  The overwhelming use of black deepens the mystery of the sequence, giving us holes to fall into.  The shape formed by the little white on the ultimate panel of the second to last page also suggests an eye and therefore foreshadows the ending. And very rare is the artist who can combine outright simplicity with spot meticulous rendering and filthy textural fills in only those inches they are called for.  To continue with the film theme, the cumulative effect is similar to the unease created by David Lynch’s unsettling oeuvre.  McKeever transcends this by doing it with images so strong and perfectly selected that we don’t need them flying by at 30 frames per second: we can linger on their haunting beauty indefinitely.





Reinvigorating the Form

30 11 2008

I guess I should be embarrassed to admit that I did not learn a working definition of the term “sublime” until junior year in college. I suppose the dictionary version is something akin to “beauty beyond description.” I take that somewhat literally and think of it as something so moving it would honestly be useless trying to describe through words: an intensity of beauty so profound as to be a transcendent, quasi-religious experience; wheels within wheels, vibrating within one and throughout the ether that unites us. Tears would be histrionic and superfluous. The joy is all subsuming.

I say working definition because, again, the Sublime is something one must experience.

Junior year I stood in front of a Rothko.

Now, to preface this, I was a painting major at Yale creating narrative works with a mind towards commercial art and illustration. To put it mildly, the art department and I did not exactly see eye to eye. My teachers encouraged me to move towards some sort kitsch or avant-garde — to abandon my instincts or to treat them as ridiculous or ironic — and I continued to ignore them and accept C’s. This back-story is simply to explain that the Abstract Expressionism of Mark Rothko should have been the type of work I would be happy to name-drop derisively during a critique of one my classmates transparent attempts to just spill their souls on the canvas, man. Let it all out in a cathartic ecstasy, you know. They can’t even remember creating it, for real, they were in such a fervor of artistic emesis. I only had respect for those artists for whom the act of creation was obviously a struggle, a clear struggle. That ran a gamut, from Rembrandt to Richter as well as Dore to Darrow, but self-satisfied ironic or abstract post-modernists were largely excluded. To be honest, I didn’t get it. This holds true for some to this day.

But standing in front of a Rothko, one finds all arguments of aesthetics inconsequential. I’ll post a useless image here just to reiterate my definition of sublime:

Mark Rothko

art: Mark Rothko

Seriously? Yeah, again it’s a real-life experience, not a series of pixels on a blog. What can I say? They are bigger than you are? That this size allows them to envelop your periphery and function as doorways? That the chromatic relationships are in perfect harmony? The brushwork… The inevitable bisecting razor of the horizon line…

This is fluff. Go to a museum. Ask the security guard where the Rothko’s are. Stand in front of one.

This is how an atheist communes with God. I am sorry the internet is not very accepting of this sort of thing, but I am not meaning these words to sound even slightly tongue-in-cheek or hyperbolic. I am serious as death. I felt things opening inside me. Things falling away. Thrilled to be alive and not-quite alive at the same time.

And dumbfounded that another human being could create such an experience.

Since I found that working definition, I started using the word constantly. I am sure my praising of works perhaps went a little over the top in those days. I mean, Fight Club’s pretty frickin’ great, but…

These days I reserve the word for those experiences in art that reorganize my entire being at once. Sort of pick me up and shuffle me. Take me out of myself and back, aware that something is now profoundly different in the pathways of my thoughts, the way I will interpret and see my world.

When my fiancée and I read Song of Myself together one summer evening in our sun room, windows open, warm breeze, bottle of wine, (all of that welcome, but unnecessary), that was sublime. The poem was so overwhelming to me, so all-encompassing, that I, a non-smoker, forced us to pause halfway through our reading of it so we could go down to the gas station and get cigarettes. I needed that stereotypically post-coital drag. I was that tingly and buzzing. (It was one glass, all you cynical haters.)

Some sublime experiences are repeatable, assuming they are reserved for moments of necessity: beauty emergencies. These occur mostly in the musical milieu, given its experiential nature. The chiming, interlocking guitars that begin at the three minute eight second mark of Interpol’s “P.D.A.” are sublime. Nothing else matters with a pair of good headphones over your ears and that transcendent dissonance to gorgeous harmony up and over and away and back again bouncing inside your soul. I now try to save the end of that song for drives into work on days I know will be especially trying, when I need to be reminded that we humans can sometimes escape the strangling clutches of this mortal coil.

Chris Forgues, known as C.F., sets out to illustrate this sublime experience and ends up creating one:

Avodah Books © Chris Forgues

art: C.F. book: Kramers Ergot publisher: Avodah Books © Chris Forgues

Avodah Books © Chris Forgues

art: C.F. book: Kramers Ergot publisher: Avodah Books © Chris Forgues

Avodah Books © Chris Forgues

art: C.F. book: Kramers Ergot publisher: Avodah Books © Chris Forgues

Avodah Books © Chris Forgues

art: C.F. book: Kramers Ergot publisher: Avodah Books © Chris Forgues

Avodah Books © Chris Forgues

art: C.F. book: Kramers Ergot publisher: Avodah Books © Chris Forgues

Now, I’m not going to even bother trying to put into words what occurs in that gorgeous visual cacophony towards the end. All I will attempt is to point out that here Forgues found a way to brilliantly bind the energetic doodly assemblages of the rest of the Kramers krowd to narrative purposes. And with what results! With this piece, Forgues legitimately pushes the form forward in a deliberately boundary-stretching album and, more impressively, beats out Sammy Harkham’s early-favorite (its around page 100) and astounding “Poor Sailor” as the most vital work of Kramers Ergot 4. I should add that all readers who have not simply must buy a copy of the whole volume, both because my pal Sean T. Collins is absolutely right in saying that one cannot overestimate its importance to the future of comics (see his Dark Side of the Moon comparison in the link in the sidebar) and because I have chopped off the beginning and end in deference to what I’m sure are Forgues wishes of selling more books. I cannot in good conscience put up an entire work, even if it is a short story. This consideration has meant that the brilliant explanation that Forgues himself provides for the above has been excised. The brilliance you see here, or all its glory, is actually diminished by its lack of punchline. I assure you, the humor and absurdity that follows in the original does not detract from, but rather heightens, the profundity.

Forgues found a way to inject jet fuel into a then somewhat stagnant art form by doing what the Fauves and Picasso did before him, looking to the unabashed creative chutzpah of children’s art. This sequence begins innocuously, and its placement in the center of a volume housing other more straightforward stories employing this art school faux-naivete makes the reader completely awestruck by the turn it takes. The artistic chops that come in the climax should not catch the careful viewer completely unawares. Forgues tips his hand ever so slightly with his one “background” in the second page of this selection. That blue “wall” should strike anyone who has ever attempted to rein in the beast that is watercolors as far more accomplished than the untrained kid-with-crayon-box look he is attempting. It is the first hint that Forgues is not simply aiming for surreal, juvenile, ironic or nostalgic. And when this pays off, we the reader are rewarded with that indescribable, ineffable, unknowable experience our stand-in protagonist (the beautifully named Quiet Grace) is given. C.F. makes us want to believe that any child, given the typical skills and tools associated with the age, could create a spiritual epiphany his or her parents would hang by a magnet to the fridge.

I suppose it was no accident that one year both Chris Ware and the Fort Thunder Kids, a collective from Providence with which Forgues has been associated, had their own rooms at the Whitney Biennial. Thanks to gentlemen like those guys, I still have no regrets about choosing this corner of the Art world to explore. And yes, sorry Yale, that is Art with a capital A. We’ve touched the sublime.





The End Goal Is “The End of Something”

23 11 2008

Our final project, that we will work on in class throughout the course, is a sixteen page comic adaptation of Ernest Hemingway’s masterful short story “The End of Something.” This work was selected for its metaphoric weight and a nuance necessary to its success that many indie comics do not attempt. I would love to see comics best craftswomen and craftsmen attempt imaginative stories that tell emotional truths, as those of our best literature do, and get away from this absurd notion that autobiographies and non-fiction historical tales are somehow more fitting to a form aiming for art because “it’s REAL, man.” In all honesty, I believe the slew of comics practitioners who are merely relating banal occurrences in their own lives without “hiding” behind fictional scenes and constructs are really just exhibiting a laziness regarding the crafting of the tale. It is more difficult to fit real life situations to thematic goals. It is harder to select which details of the event were central to its effect on one’s life, and which were merely superfluous circumstance. It’s tough to decide whether or not a change in time, setting, or age would amplify the impact of the event. It requires impressive acts of imagining to attach feelings and happenings to appropriate metaphors. It’s even harder to take further steps back in detachment from the scene to find recurring motifs or symbols that could be shown to repeatedly echo the story in miniature.

I am baffled at the simple fact that nearly every page of any published novel will have at least one visual metaphor to help the reader understand the scene in a relational context and assess the appropriate tone, yet comics nearly NEVER employ metaphors. In college, a roommate of mine named Aaron Greenblatt changed my life by simply sharing something he found beautiful. He was reading Nathanael West’s The Day of the Locust and he just had to share the following section with his artist roommate:

He got out of bed in sections, like a poorly made automaton, and carried his hands to the bathroom. He turned on the cold water. When the basin was full, he plunged his hands in up to the wrists. They lay quietly on the bottom like a pair of strange aquatic animals. When they were thoroughly chilled and began to crawl about, he lifted them out and hid them in a towel. (Chapter 8 )

His experience was how true that was to the physical feeling described. Sleeping hands beneath water do seem like “strange aquatic animals.” West had to go that far away from the reality of the situation – to the bottom of the ocean from a dirty apartment – to get to the truth of the experience. That requires impressive thinking to get the reader to experience what he did in the same way by relating it to a completely different field of knowledge. Aaron summed this up with, “I love the imagery. His hands as a squid at the bottom of this bowl.” I was floored and embarrassed. How could a novelist have come up with a better visual than an artist ever drew? Why had art explored such images for the sake of the surreal with Dali, but almost never for the sake of the more real as West and all novelists and poets did. I believe I said aloud, “Why would an artist not draw exactly that if he were adapting this work: the man’s hands now transformed to squids at the end of his arms lying submerged in the sink? Would the audience make the leap if the arts stole that figurativeness as another tool for visual arts as well?” Unfortunately, I have yet to fully employ this trick in my own art – though it’s in the works for an adaptation of another work of West’s I have begun. Of all places, the television series Ally McBeal was perhaps the first place to really give that sort of thing a go, but it was always employed to campy effect. “I feel like I’m drowning” becomes the skeletal main character swimming past legal pads and office chairs.

“The End of Something” instead employs a literature trope that can clearly be turned visual without any fear of audience confusion. It is truly the bread and butter of comic book mechanics: juxtaposition. Hemingway chooses to adapt reality by placing his tale of a breakup side-by-side with a discussion of the dismantling of a mill town. The latter becomes a symbol of the former. The paragraphs on the mill come first, serving as a foreshadowing for the dismantling of the relationship that is to follow. Even these sort of thematic resonances are rarely explored visually because of the unwarranted respect “honesty” is given in the indie comics world.

Those who are familiar with Hemingway will point out that the character of Nick Adams is the frequently recurring stand-in for Hemingway himself in his most autobiographical stories: an author who survived a war or two and has lived in exotic locales. This fact could be thrown in my face as proof positive that Hemingway too is just “telling it like it is.”

He is not. Nor did he ever. That’s why we keep him when so many diaries of fascinating contemporaries of his have been justly lost to the ages.

Hemingway, in actuality, lived a life much more fascinating than many of us could dream of, and yet his writing that truly matters most is to convince us of an existence that is humdrum and every day. The Sun Also Rises do not interest us for its travelogue settings throughout Spain; it is for its pitch perfect evocation of malaise. The African mountain that gives the name to “The Snows of Kilimanjaro” does not prompt fancies on the part of the reader involving Papa Hemingway’s macho hunting safaris. The story is set there for the astounding otherworldly image of the inexplicably out-of-place snow leopard that opens the work: a confoundingly perfect symbol for the feverish death and hope for ascension that is to come. Hemingway had so much “fascinating” life experience that he had every reason to rest on it and be an absolutely atrocious adventure writer. Instead, he subverts the outward truths of his life and develops an art that is perfectly constructed to have us believe he is merely reporting factually the utterly banal. His best sentences never rise to more verbosity or figuration than “It’s pretty to think so,” or “I feel fine,” or “Little devil, I wonder if he lied to me,” to say nothing of the brilliant line that seals the deal in this final project. They are so stripped of pretense so as to seem verbatim. But how many of us could pare worlds of complex and conflicting emotions to such perfect, crystalline expressions that say everything through nothing? Thomas C. Foster explains this phenomena much better than I am in his wonderful How to Read Novels Like a Professor, but we all must at least acknowledge this: Hemingway, through intensive thought and effort, makes stories seem crushingly commonplace, tossed off, and therefore real.

Let us consider the story in question, “The End of Something.” Are there any details we learn of Nick Adams that prevent him from being Hemingway? None, in fact, we know Hemingway was an avid fisherman. Was Hemingway familiar with and sympathetic to American towns that had lost their sense of purpose and become shells of their former glory? Certainly, he grew up in Michigan. Lastly, were Hemingway’s relationships with women as riven and sublimated as they come off here? More so, if Gertrude Stein is to be believed, which is perhaps hinted at in the ending I decided to trim as too complicated here. The Complete Nick Adams Stories glosses over what is perhaps the true nature of Bill’s appearance at the end of the story by following it immediately with the less suggestive but equally awesome “The Three Day Blow.” All I’ll say about that here is that it is hardly accidental that a story this short contains the echoing sentences “They (Nick and Marjorie) sat on the blanket without touching each other and watched the moon rise” and “He felt Bill coming up to the fire. Bill didn’t touch him, either.” So finally, could Hemingway have actually broken up with a girl in this manner? Of course.

But did it happen near a ruined mill in a town that had been ripped apart physically the way Nick was now tearing Marjorie down emotionally?

No.

Were the fish coincidentally not biting that day either?

No.

Did he rip the guts out of a fish with absolutely no realization that this act was pretty damn symbolic of what he was about to do to his lady friend?

Hemingway is no idiot. They probably weren’t even fishing when this occurred.

Did they really begin their conversation with the girl offering the loaded words “There’s our old ruin.”

Are you kidding me?

Hemingway has done a ton of difficult work in making connections across vastly different times in his life that share an emotional resonance. He has placed all these disparate events side-by-side, and thrown in some believable imagined ones, to create what Sartre’s main characters in Nausea strove for: a perfect moment. And in this case, perfectly horrid and, given that it involves a breakup, thus perfectly real, true. Eye-witness accounts are bunk. We do not remember what happened. Our every experience is selective. We change our own details without knowing it in the service of heightening the only truth we experience: an emotional one. Breakups feel this desolate and awful. Our experience of them includes the pathetic fallacy of the environment: they never occur on sunny days. If food was consumed, it was terrible. Our every word leading up to the event seemed passive aggressive in retrospect. Our past is constantly being rewritten in the way that Salman Rushdie describes the phenomenon of John Lennon (it applies to Kurt Cobain as well): every photo of him became morose and prophetic the moment he died. An instant before hundreds were joyous.

It is the author and the artists job to shape those truths. To make them more real. If events are put down exactly as they occurred, it becomes the readers job to analyze your boring life and figure out its significance. To…what? Significance to you? Why is that my job? Significance to me? I don’t care! It’s your life. I’ve got my own humdrum existence to try and figure out.

Comic book artists, and yes, some of ones with the most potential, have been getting away with lazy pointless writing that would NEVER be published in any serious literary magazine, and would be TORN TO SHREDS in even an introductory creative writing class. As soon as it’s made into lines on a page, it’s a lie. “Real”ness just leads to lots of derivative and unlistenable punk rock. We needed the Stooges and the Sex Pistols exactly once, and thats going on forty years ago. Stop being real and learn how to play your instrument, and by that I mean manipulate your audience. Figure out what you are trying to make me feel and use tools, including lies, to make me feel it. Then we can both share in your truth. Comic historians would probably trace the horrible trend of getting daring points by just telling it like it is, warts and all, to the underground comics of Robert Crumb. I would argue that just about everything that made Crumb interesting, aside from his awesome hatching, is completely fantastic and totally detached from reality, (drugs were probably involved). Ask the average person who lived through it what they remember about Crumb and I can almost guarantee your going to hear Mr. Natural, a farcical mystic with an impossible beard, Fritz the Cat, an anthropomorphized feline porno star, or the Vulture Goddess, a horrific extension of the misogyny of La Demoiselles d’Avignon. Or they might recall any of a number of his fantasies about the bizarre escapades he might have with impossibly proportioned women. His run-of-the-mill, by-the-book, infinitely less-interesting work on American Splendor was not what he built a reputation upon. Why is that the aspect of his work that is currently being aped by so many?

To hammer this all home, I present the worst thing my idol, Chris Ware, has ever done:

Chris Ware  © F. Chris Ware

art: Chris Ware book: Acme Novelty Library publisher: Chris Ware © F. Chris Ware

For nearly the first time, Ware is guilty of the charges he has so often self-deprecatingly levied against his own work: it is insular, self-serving, self-pitying, whiny drivel. And it is guilty of the “worst crime in art,” it is boring. Ironically, I can learn more about Chris Ware and his daily existence from the fictional lives of his fictional stand-ins Jimmy Corrigan and Rusty Brown than I could ever hope to from this page about the daily existence of Chris Ware.

To end an essay that has clearly gotten away from its stated purpose, let me state my purpose. The final assignment for this class is an adaptation of a work of literature so that future comic book artists are not afraid to use the tools that have served great fiction for so many centuries: symbolism, metaphor, and other forms of lies. I hope the work you all go on to make has more in common with the artistry of Hemingway, one who purports truth to reality through meticulous constructions, than with the current crop of comic authors who worship a false god of “realness” and end up creating meaningless, nonsensical, haphazard “truths” that cannot be mined for any Truth, even by their creators, because even they don’t know what it all means. It is no accident that the most widely acknowledged and read works remain those that most resemble the constructions of great fiction: Chris Ware’s Jimmy Corrigan and the works of Dan Clowes. In the words of Beyonce and Shakira, they are beautiful lies. If this focus here on what to draw seems to contradict my Frank Miller argument elsewhere on this site, it is only because I truly believe these artists are not considering what they want to or should create, they are supporting a bogus concept of hipness, and opting for what is easiest. We all know what happened to us today. And, no, I don’t want to hear about this crazy thing you dreamed last night…

“Listen, do you want me to make an effort or don’t you? You were so stupid this last time. Don’t you see how beautiful this moment could be? Look at the sky, look at the color of th sun on the carpet. I’ve got my green dress on and my face isn’t made up, I’m quite pale. Go back, go and sit in the shadow; you understand what you have to do? Come on! How stupid you are! Speak to me!”

I felt the success of the enterprise was in my hands: the moment had an obscure meaning which had to be trimmed and perfected; certain motions had to be made, certain words spoken: I staggered under the weight of my responsibility. (Nausea, Jean-Paul Sartre, trans. Lloyd Alexander, 62)





Character designs for Nick Adams and Marjorie

23 11 2008

Here are reference sheets assembled from student sketches for both of the main characters in Hemingway’s short. The students designed versions of each character, and then voted on the best elements from each. These sketches of mine are amalgamations of those choices. We decided to make the characters teens (admittedly, that was something of an executive decision on my part) given that the story can resonate on that early love intensity level now for you all. As you age, the story will take on a different dimension and pathos to match Hemingway’s middle-aged version of this tragedy. Though the meaning will shift somewhat in our version, younger is not meant to imply a tragedy any less profound. Nick’s final analysis of the relationship slices to the bone no matter what type of love preceded it.

nickmarjorieThis next sketch is a closeup of Marjorie’s face. This is essential as it is very difficult to draw women this beautiful consistently. One line that is a bit too long or curved or misplaced will send the whole thing into an ugly tailspin. The key is the simplicity the artist captured. It has been said, (I wish I knew by whom) that every line on a drawing of a woman’s face adds five years. Given that we are dealing with a teen, it is vital to keep the line count as low as our reference shot. Beauty is subtlety. Focus on those almond eyes, the width of the lips, and the curve of the chin to keep the character consistent. The artist is left anonymous for legal reasons involving displaying the work of minors when teaching. If I can work out permissions, I will certainly give credit where credit is obviously due for a beautiful image.

marjorie





Mill Reference

23 11 2008

Here is a reference sketch I assembled from many photos for the ruined mill.

millref

Focus on the tilted water wheel and the gouged supports beneath the house. The smoke stack should be missing some bricks at the top and can pop up in numerous backgrounds. The number on the house is 16 for the sake of irony. I figure that’s about the age of these teens, and sixteen is usually associated with “sweet”ness, but here it’s ruin.





Simultaneity

12 11 2008

In The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay, Michael Chabon does one brilliant thing after another, and no, I’m not just talking about his sentences. His first coup d’etat is making you more interested in the lives of his normal human protagonists than in those of their larger-than-life superhuman creations. His second is a wonderful formal trick that takes advantage of his understanding that first fact. Every time one of his all-too-human heroes is thrown into a real bind, once quite literally faced with a ticking time bomb, Chabon switches to a chapter about the comic book they’ve created AND NEVER HAVE I CARED LESS ABOUT PRETERNATURALLY GIFTED OVERMEN IN BEYOND-DIRE ESCAPADES IN WHICH THE FATE OF THE PLANET HANGS IN BALANCE! And it’s not just because I never really care for the trite trappings of the genre like that. Nor that Chabon’s Escapist and Luna Moth are dull — they are as serviceable as the rest in tights. It is because Chabon has found a way to make the “real” banal world so much more compelling, and he pulled the bait and switch. As you progress through the book, you begin to be able to feel the tension get so opressive and thick, and you just know the next chapter is going to be about that damn Escapist! Damn you, Chabon! Just let the scene play through!

But Chabon knows better than that. Cross-cutting, switching from one scene to another and back again, can assure reader attention. It keeps her on her toes. It also provides ample opportunity for two seemingly-unrelated tales to butt up against one another in fascinating ways, often providing a synergy impossible if kept in their respective corners.

Now, Chabon is far from an innovator here. E.L. Doctorow does it constantly and to even greater effect in his sublime The Book of Daniel. That book switches plotlines, timelines, and writing styles so often you need a scorecard, but always for essential effects and reasons. The whole thing is being assembled from notecards and an outline in the library by the narrator as we read it, so diversions and thematic abutments are par for the course. He’s working out as he goes, don’t you know? Coppola, director of your homework assignment for Layout, famously does it not only in your opening, but also in the climax of Apocalypse Now. Through perfectly timed and selected cross cuts we are led to believe we are literally watching a giant machete hack huge chunks out of Marlon Brando’s fleshy corpus. It is harrowing to watch. But in fact, we are merely watching a bull get ritualistically slaughtered on camera and die before our eyes. Ah, thank god. I was really convinced I was being subjected to something awful for a bit there. (You’ll never catch that “No animals were harmed during the making of this film” disclaimer on any of Coppola’s early work. That horse’s head in The Godfather? Not a prosthetic. And I heard Francis and Gene Hackman just killed a dog for fun off-camera during the making of The Conversation.) The point being, Coppola joins two scenes of raw, brutal intensity and shows them to us simultaneously so our capacities are overloaded. We are left confounded and drained, unable to pull apart the pieces to know exactly what sort of “horror” we have just witnessed. Even John Woo uses cross-cutting to great effect in the “romantic” car chase between Tom Cruise and Thandie Newton in Mission Impossible II: a twirl of red cars interspliced with the twirls of the red-dressed Spanish dancer from the previous scene. The cars become lovers, the chase: sexy.

Comic books, despite their defining characteristic as the art of juxtaposition, do very little putting scenes side-by-side. It’s a lack that is ripe with untapped possibilities. Here’s just a pretty standard Chabon-like use of it to heighten tension and build suspense through dramatic irony:

Marvel Comics Group  © Marvel Comics Group

art: Rob Haynes book: Daredevil publisher: Marvel Comics Group © Marvel Comics Group

Simplicity is best for the execution of this sort of thing, so here Haynes opts for a standard Kirby six grid, and keeps the left side for the girl, the right for the crook. The colorist helpfully separates the scenes through palette: cool colors for the lady’s shower, warm colors for the would-be perp’s hot-blood. (Don’t worry; Daredevil somehow stops him.) Notice how the girl seems so much more oblivious since the guy is literally right next to her. This omniscient viewpoint gives us audience members a sense of superiority. We want to shout warnings or derision at the woman. It makes the read interactive. Imagine these same scenes played out separately over the course of two different pages. We readers would just be yelling, “Get on with it! Yeah, I see where this is going.” Displayed simultaneously, with shot for shot correspondences (first tier: full body shots, second tier: closeups on hands and their items, third tier: over-the-shoulder focused on mouths), the tango seems to be unbearable, unimagined and unavoidable.





Krazy Kat births Quimby Mouse

2 11 2008

Chris Ware is the absolute best thing in comics for a plethora of reasons, one of which is the fact that he has absorbed the entire history of great newspaper comics. Many, many have tried to match the ingenuity of George Herriman’s intricate layout games. At times, Ware bests them. Case in point:

Fantagraphics Books  © F. Chris Ware

art: Chris Ware book: Acme Novelty Library publisher: Fantagraphics Books © F. Chris Ware

The typography is perfect, the graphic design with the complementary colors and balanced inverted triangles is stunning, and the pipes function as more than just a clever conceit. The design here is like a well-constructed rhyme: it’s impossible to tell which line came first. All elements have to function in unison.





OMG! Best Opening Ever!!!

2 11 2008

This is truly untouchable.  Apparently, Francis Ford Coppola pretty much went mad making this film.  Heck, if a brush with insanity is all it takes to make art like this, reserve a room for me in Bedlam!  Prepare to be bowled over if you’ve never had the pleasure:

Your mission is to get some of this sequence (until his unbelievable first line) on at least one 10×15″ page, trippiness intact.   Look at some of the samples of page layout as meta-panels and  graphic design and see if you can find a way to preserve the feel of the overlapping dissolves and visual puns on a static page.  I want your page to include not merely the images, but the entire tone of the sequence, and this will mostly be accomplished through some sort of unique panel arrangement.  Can you find a way to make the connection between the chopper blades and the ceiling fan through well-placed juxtaposition?  How about the crucial correlation (made even more apparent at the end of the film) between Sheen’s face and that of the Buddha statue?  Can you “time” the napalm explosion for shock value?  Is it even feasible that somehow it could draw to a close on the page with that triple image of gun/eye/fan?   Do what Coppola did to film with comics: re-think all the rules.





No one’s had a debut like this since Led Zeppelin

2 11 2008

Now, don’t get me wrong; Blankets is an amazing piece of work. The thing is 300 pages of ambition the likes of which has not been seen in one chunk since 1987. However, if someone asked me for Craig Thompson’s best work, I’d be reaching back to his exceedingly smaller, talking-animal debut. Thompson re-imagines what can be done with comics every other page, and the story will make you cry and cry and cry. There is so much intelligence that went into this book that I find something new to be floored by every time, yet it all comes off as so effortless. Look at how Thompson finds a way to work vignettes into an establishing shot below:

Top Shelf Productions © Craig Thomsponart: Craig Thompson book: Goodbye, Chunky Rice publisher: Top Shelf Productions © Craig Thompson

This “picture frame” effect makes for beautiful graphic design, but would normally be unusable since it confounds reading order. However, since all the events in the scene are occurring simultaneously, as McCloud’s aspect-to-aspect transitions rather than any sort of moment-to-moment, this problem is moot.

Here’s another one of those “why didn’t I think of it first” moves:

Top Shelf Productions © Craig Thomsponart: Craig Thompson book: Goodbye, Chunky Rice publisher: Top Shelf Productions © Craig Thompson

The negative space that begins the second page of the spread immediately calls attention to itself. What possible purpose could an all blank panel serve, the eye wonders before even reaching it. This suspense reaches a hilarious outcome as the dialog is read and pondered. One of the conjoined twins laments, “I hate it when my tushies are white,” just before said panel which clearly forms the sky that continues below in the harrowing scene that follows. Putting two and two together, the intelligent reader will conclude Thompson has accomplished the heretofore impossible. He has given us the clever movie zoom/dissolve to scene change. We have zoomed in on the twin’s tan-less cheek, been overcome with white, and then pulled back to reveal that this white is now a blinding sky above a sun-baked beach years before. Genius!





FFC, Meet BWS

2 11 2008

The only thing that gets close to capturing the mood and beauty of your homework assignment movie clip, but already in comic book form:

Marvel Comics Group © Marvel Comics Group

art: Barry Windsor Smith book: Weapon X publisher: Marvel Comics Group © Marvel Comics Group

Marvel Comics Group © Marvel Comics Group

art: Barry Windsor Smith book: Weapon X publisher: Marvel Comics Group © Marvel Comics Group

Marvel Comics Group © Marvel Comics Group

art: Barry Windsor Smith book: Weapon X publisher: Marvel Comics Group © Marvel Comics Group

Marvel Comics Group © Marvel Comics Group

art: Barry Windsor Smith book: Weapon X publisher: Marvel Comics Group © Marvel Comics Group

Marvel Comics Group © Marvel Comics Group

art: Barry Windsor Smith book: Weapon X publisher: Marvel Comics Group © Marvel Comics Group

Notice how the images can often be read in nearly any order, and the odd-shaped, interlocking layout encourages this.  Smith also finds unusual visual connections between panels.  Have a look at the masterful transition from Wolvie’s hair, to cables, to skeletal claws.  Even without the well-written words, the delusional, feverish juxtaposition of disturbing imagery already puts one in mind of the apocalypse that is coming.